Adjuvant Low-dose Ketamine in Pediatric Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Crisis

Ketamine

Brief Summary

Acute vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) in sickle cell disease (SCD) are primarily managed with opioids. Tolerance and hyperalgesia to opioids develops due to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor mediated activation of the nociceptive system, and as a receptor antagonist, ketamine mitigates this. Intravenous (IV) ketamine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing post-operative, chronic, and cancer-related pain in pediatrics, as well as in reducing time to pain control in the emergency department (ED) in adults. Limited studies suggest efficacy in adult opioid-refractory SCD patients. This study is investigating the safety and tolerability of adjuvant low-dose IV ketamine bolus for pediatric SCD VOE in the ED, as well as its efficacy in improving pain control and reducing hospitalization.

Intervention / Treatment

  • Ketamine (DRUG)
    The intervention is IV low-dose bolus ketamine as an adjuvant to standard therapy (IV opiates and NSAIDs).

Condition or Disease

  • Sickle Cell Disease
  • Vaso-occlusive Crisis

Phase

  • Phase 2

    • Study Design

    Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
    Status: Completed
    Study results: No Results Available
    Age: 10 Years to 25 Years
    Enrollment: 62 (ACTUAL)
    Funded by: Other
    Allocation: Non-Randomized
    Primary Purpose: Treatment

    Masking

    Clinical Trial Dates

    Start date: Jun 01, 2016
    Primary Completion: Apr 01, 2018 ACTUAL
    Completion Date: Apr 01, 2018 ACTUAL
    Study First Posted: Sep 28, 2017 ACTUAL
    Results First Posted: Apr 20, 2021 ACTUAL
    Last Updated: Mar 25, 2021

    Sponsors / Collaborators

    Lead Sponsor: UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
    Lead sponsor is responsible party
    Responsible Party: N/A

    Location

    Oakland, California, USA

    In this cohort study, all consenting pediatric sickle-cell patients between 10 and 25 years old who were cared for at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland (UCSFBCHO) presenting to the emergency department for VOC were enrolled in the study. Patients were compared to themselves in a time series, pre and post exposure to the study intervention (low-dose ketamine bolus at 0.2 mg/kg x 1 prior to second dose of IV opiate). The pediatric FACES pain scale was used to measure pain scales at pre-designated time points in the ED per standard nursing protocol (FACES for younger kids, visual analog scale in adolescents/young adults). Opiate usage was summed in the ED, converted to mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents (since different opioids agents were given to different patients based on individual historical efficacy, and since length of stay in the emergency room could affect total morphine equivalents received), and compared between the pre and post-intervention groups. In addition, length of stay, time to 50% pain control, presentation and discharge pain scores, and likelihood of discharge from the ED were compared. Data was be collected via chart review in the UCSFBCHO system by study investigators. Pre-intervention data from the past three patient encounters (e.g., the mean of the mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents used in the last three patient encounters prior to receipt of ketamine) was compared to the post intervention data. In addition, a survey, which is attached, was given to patients/families at the time of the drug administration to attempt to discern if patients subjectively experienced improvement in their pain and if they experienced any negative side effects due to the drug administration. Monitoring for adverse events was recorded for each patient encounter.

    Participant Groups

    • Prior to the second dose of IV opiates, the experiment was to give patients a single IV bolus of ketamine at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg. Pain scores were collected using the FACES scale currently in place. In consenting patients, chart review was performed with the following data collected: mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents, pain scores on admission, during the encounter, and at discharge, the time to 50% pain reduction, and whether or not the patient was discharged. In addition, a survey, which is attached, was given to patients/families at the time of drug administration to determine if they experienced a subjective improvement in their pain and if they suffered any undue side effects due to drug administration.

    • Patient data from at least one but up three patient encounters within the prior year were compared to their visit in which they were given adjuvant ketamine, using the outcome measures in the "Intervention" arm. Since this a historical control study, patients acted as their own controls in the above manner. Patients were allowed to re-enroll 4 weeks after presentation, which is typically considered a separate vaso-occlusive episode in the literature.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Sex: All
    Minimum Age: 10
    Maximum Age: 25
    Age Groups: Child / Adult
    Healthy Volunteers: Yes

    Inclusion Criteria:

    * All English-speaking, sickle cell patients who receive their care at UCSFBCHO in the Department of Hematology who are 8-to-25-years-old presenting to the emergency department for VOC were asked to enroll.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    * Prior adverse reaction to ketamine
    * Patients were asked during the consent process if they have ever received ketamine, and if so, if they had any serious adverse reaction, such as difficulty breathing, dysphoria, hallucinations, or allergic reaction. If they have, ketamine was not given to these patients.
    * Patients who have received ketamine and experienced nausea or vomiting will be asked if they wish to receive the medication. If they do not, they did not receive ketamine.

    Primary Outcomes

    • The number of serious and minor adverse events was measured via patient-completed survey as well as by nurse and medical providers on presentation to the emergency department (ED). Serious adverse events are defined as cardiorespiratory events requiring intervention. Minor adverse events are defined as nausea/vomiting, emergence reaction (dysphoria; hallucinations; frightening dreams), and a sense of de-realization or "dreamy" sensation. Both study providers and patients themselves, via a survey that the parent and/or patient (based on age) fills out post receipt of ketamine, reported serious and minor adverse events.

    Secondary Outcomes

    • Opioid usage for at least one but up to three prior patient visits in the last one year for each patient enrolled in the study was summarized, expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h, to account for different types of opioids used per patient preference, and then this was compared to the intervention group that received LDK. Percent change in opioid usage (expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h) is reported).

    • Patient pain scores at presentation for the enrolled encounters and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).

    • Percent discharge from the ED for intervention group and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. Participants were assigned a "0" if discharged or "1" if not discharged.

    • After receipt of LDK, patients and/or their parents, based on age, filled out a survey based on a Likert scale regarding their agreement (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) with the following statements: Achieved faster pain relief with LDK, Achieved more complete pain relief with LDK, and Desire to receive LDK in a future vaso-occlusive crisis. There is also an area where patients could provide general comments regarding their experience in receiving LDK. Count of Participants who agree or strongly agree for each question are reported.

    • Patient pain scores at time of discharge from the ED/admission to the hospital for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain scores post receipt of ketamine are presented for the intervention group. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).

    • Length of stay (LOS) in minutes in the ED for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed.

    • Time to 50% pain reduction (pain reported 50% less than baseline) in minutes for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed as historical controls. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).

    More Details

    NCT Number: NCT03296345
    Acronym: AKTSS
    Other IDs: 2010-010
    Study URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03296345
    Last updated: Sep 29, 2023